Day 3 –
The student portion of the conference had ended. A long line of respected Christians and men
wearing a kippah, a long beard and carrying massive shofars who I assumed were
Jewish (but weren’t necessarily) started coming to the breakout sessions. The apparently fairly moderate rhetoric had
turned instantaneously into a more inflammatory and inciting one. We started all over again as the same
narrative was laid out to us, grown up style.
There was no need for “education” any more. The people who had paid 250$
just to get into the conference didn’t need that. The choir had arrived to be preached at, and
they didn’t miss the chance for a standing ovation every time, on cue.
At his point I had given up.
I wasn’t a leader and no revolution would start here. There was nothing to add, and no questions to
ask. Every time I thought I might have
the courage to stand up and challenge the speaker in front of this fierce crowd,
I gave up and walked out of the session.
There was no point to it. I would
instead go and sit in front of my computer on the floor of the convention
center, as if in silent protest, to try to write down my thoughts, but I couldn’t. Nothing came out. For the first time in a while I was without
words.
I knew that I was a moderate; and I fought to stay within
the outlines of my convictions, to stick to realpolitik and remember that these
people could be allies. They were
supporting a cause I objectively agreed with, to support Israel. But I also intimately knew the details, and
couldn’t keep hearing such crass justifications without recognizing the
suffering my country was causing. I would silently pull out my “Breaking the
Silence” booklet of testimonies of IDF soldiers from the west bank in Hebrew. I would read another testimony of looting, of
senseless aggression, and of abuse. I thought
about these young 19 years old kids who were me not too long ago. They all
reminded me of my older brother who went silent for three years while serving
in Hebron, because he couldn’t share his experiences with anyone. Whether it was due to shame or just a lack of
coping mechanisms to this day I don’t know.
But I also couldn’t help but to go back to the presentation that showed
what the support for Israel is dealing with on campuses in the US. Among other
things it showed a video of a young female college student yelling at the top
of her lungs “Go back to Auschwitz! Jews
are committing another holocaust! He (Hitler I assume) should have completed
the job!” It was beyond hate, it was
blind rage inspired by actions I felt the need to take responsibility for. But
what could I do with senseless loathing in a video, a reality I could not agree
with that people were confronting. I was
reminded of the stories I had heard from so many friends about incidents from
their IDF service in Hebron. The settlers would instigate Palestinians by
splashing water or throwing rocks and it immediately turned into an incident in
front of their eyes. Within seconds rocks would start flying from side to side
enraged with hate, detest and mouthful of curses in mixed Arabic and Hebrew. My
friends were caught in the middle of a raging fight, helpless to calm each side
down. They weren’t allowed to shoot at
the instigating settlers, and according to their orders they could open fire
only if their lives were threatened, and that would mean towards the
Palestinians only. Of course they were reluctant
to open fire on anyone, but all they had to try to calm a storm of rocks above
their heads were their M-16’s, which were useless in this battle.
There was no room for moderates in this conversation anymore.
The discourse had been hijacked. It had been hijacked by messianic settlers who
believed that the death of their children was a price to pay for the lord’s
work. It had been hijacked by Palestinians who refused to settle with a reality
that had changed in the past 64 years of Israel’s existence. It had been hijacked by Israel’s mainstream
that had given up on hoping for peace and settling for the “harsh reality” that
there would never be a peaceful solution.
It had been hijacked by Palestinians who had given up on the idea of
peace and concluded that the only language Israel understands is violence. Justice stopped meaning attaining a situation
that could benefit everyone; it just means that each side was right. Period.
The rocks of propaganda
were flying above my head, but the tools at my disposal were irrelevant. All I had to offer was a dialogue, a true
discourse of people with the will to resolve an issue. I wanted to bestow upon
the people surrounding me the understanding that there’s more to it than
selling stories to a biased, blood thirsty crowd. That there was more to it than angry mobs,
fighting like children for their right to exist. That justice could be made only by
recognizing your faults and your error. But
this was neither the time nor the place for it. Ironically, we weren’t even in Israel,
but rather Washington DC, and the time for reconciliation had not arrived yet.
The question I found myself asking was I am really naïve? Was
there any room left for someone like me who desired to overcome the fear and
hesitation, and actually sit down and talk.
It’s a slippery slope once you choose a side, down the path of extremism
and a lack of recognition of “the other side”.
I started to doubt, not whether there was room for me at this
conference, but if the me’s out there still existed, or whether we had been
vanquished and exhausted by an intifada and two wars in one short decade. I wondered whether my eternal hope was still
of relevance or whether it was simply naiveté, a remnant of my deeply
ideological past.
As I left another session in the middle, not able to bear
another outburst of shofars and suits applauding for an eternal unified Jerusalem,
I realized that hope should not be vanquished by despair. That it is a belief, not based on reality but
rather on a desire and a call for action. I realized that it was the closest to
Jesus, yahwe, and Jah I would ever get. It is a belief that people can change
from the power of a discussion, from sitting in front of a person and
conversing. I may not be have been able to do that at this conference, but I know
that it is a way of life I have chosen, and I will not despair because of the
fanatics.
David Brog, the Executive Director I had put on the spot on
the first day, had asked me what I thought about the 5 Two-State solutions that
had failed. He implied that it was the
Palestinians fault they didn’t have a nation of their own, and that we “lefties”
should stop blaming Israel. I answered that we could play the “blame game” all
day, and I could probably prove how at least 4 out of five of these so-called
offers were bogus, but that it didn’t matter.
What matters is that for there to be a home for me to go back to, there
had to be a sixth offer, and if necessary a seventh and an eighth.
good conclusion...don't fk with the religious lunacies, pray with them that some day the find the light to be kind to others, again...
ReplyDeletewho wrote this? I didnt! but I support it. I guess we are all guilty of naivete, and lets keep it that way, it will pay out in the end.
ReplyDelete-it just means that each side was right.-
ReplyDeleteor it just means that everyone's an evil idiot with agendas other than peace or justice
or that each side is exactly the same, and totally wrong.
ReplyDelete